Anthropic CCAR-F 시험 개요:
| 인증 벤더: | Anthropic |
| 시험명: | Claude Certified Architect – Foundations |
| 시험 번호: | CCAR-F |
| 실제 시험 문항 수: | 60 |
| 지원 언어: | 영어 |
| 자격증 유효 기간: | 12개월 |
| 관련 자격증: | Claude Certified Architect |
| 응시료: | USD $125 |
| 시험 형식: | 시나리오 기반, 객관식, 문항당 1개의 정답 |
| 합격 점수: | 720/1000 (환산 점수) |
| 시험 시간: | 120 minutes |
| 샘플 문제: | Anthropic CCAR-F 샘플 문제 |
| 응시 방법: | 온라인 감독 시험 또는 Pearson VUE 테스트 센터. |
| 전제 조건: | Claude 및 Anthropic API를 사용하여 프로덕션 애플리케이션을 구축한 경험이 약 6개월 이상인 솔루션 아키트에게 권장됩니다. 현재 등록하려면 Anthropic Partner Network를 통한 액세스 권한이 필요하며, 필수 선수 인증 자격증은 없습니다. |
| 공식 요강 URL: | https://anthropic-partners.skilljar.com/claude-certified-architect-foundations-certification |
Anthropic CCAR-F 시험 요강 주제:
| 섹션 | 비중 | 목표 |
|---|---|---|
| 툴 디자인 및 MCP 통합 | 18% | - 툴 통합
|
| Claude Code 구성 및 워크플로우 | 20% | - Claude Code
|
| 컨텍스트 관리 및 신뢰성 | 15% | - 컨텍스트 처리
|
| 에이전틱 아키텍처 및 오케스트레이션 | 27% | - 에이전틱 아키텍처 패턴
|
| 프롬프트 엔지니어링 및 구조화된 출력 | 20% | - 프롬프트 디자인
|
최신 Claude Certified Architect CCAR-F 무료샘플문제
1. You are using Claude Code to accelerate software development. Your team uses it for code generation, refactoring, debugging, and documentation. You need to integrate it into your development workflow with custom slash commands, CLAUDE.md configurations, and understand when to use plan mode vs direct execution.
Your team frequently migrates React components to Vue. You've written a step-by-step workflow for Claude Code to follow during each migration, and you want every developer on the team to invoke it by typing
/migrate-component . The workflow should stay in sync as the team iterates on it.
Where should you place the skill file?
A) In .claude/skills/migrate-component/SKILL.md at the project root, committed to version control.
B) As a detailed instruction block in the project's root CLAUDE.md file.
C) In the project's .claude/settings.json using a skillOverrides entry to register and define the workflow.
D) In ~/.claude/skills/migrate-component/SKILL.md on each developer's machine.
2. You are building a customer support resolution agent using the Claude Agent SDK. The agent handles high- ambiguity requests like returns, billing disputes, and account issues. It has access to your backend systems through custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools ( get_customer , lookup_order , process_refund , escalate_to_human ). Your target is 80%+ first-contact resolution while knowing when to escalate.
A customer raises three separate issues during one session: a refund inquiry (turns 1-15), a subscription question (turns 16-30), and a payment method update (turns 31-45). At turn 48, the customer asks "What happened with my refund?" The conversation is approaching context limits.
What strategy best maintains the agent's ability to address all issues throughout the session?
A) Extract and persist structured issue data (order IDs, amounts, statuses) into a separate context layer.
B) Summarize earlier turns into a narrative description, preserving full message history only for the active issue.
C) Implement sliding window context that retains the most recent 30 turns.
D) Rely on MCP tools to re-fetch relevant information on demand when the customer references earlier issues.
3. You are building developer productivity tools using the Claude Agent SDK. The agent helps engineers explore unfamiliar codebases, understand legacy systems, generate boilerplate code, and automate repetitive tasks. It uses the built-in tools (Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob) and integrates with Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers.
Your code review assistant needs to analyze pull requests and provide feedback on three aspects: code style compliance, potential security issues, and documentation completeness. Each aspect requires reading files, running analysis tools, and generating a report section. The review process follows the same three-step workflow for every PR.
Which task decomposition pattern is most appropriate for this workflow?
A) Prompt chaining-break the review into sequential steps where each aspect (style, security, documentation) is analyzed separately, with outputs combined in a final synthesis step.
B) Orchestrator-workers-have a central LLM analyze each PR to dynamically determine which checks are needed, then delegate to specialized worker LLMs for each identified subtask.
C) Routing-classify each PR by type (feature, bugfix, refactor) first, then route to different review prompts optimized for that category.
D) Single comprehensive prompt-include all three instructions in one prompt and let the model handle all three aspects simultaneously.
4. You are building a customer support resolution agent using the Claude Agent SDK. The agent handles high- ambiguity requests like returns, billing disputes, and account issues. It has access to your backend systems through custom Model Context Protocol (MCP) tools ( get_customer , lookup_order , process_refund , escalate_to_human ). Your target is 80%+ first-contact resolution while knowing when to escalate.
A customer contacts the agent about a warranty claim on a power drill. Resolving this requires multiple sequential tool calls: get_customer to look up their account, lookup_order to find the purchase details, and then either process_refund or escalate_to_human depending on warranty eligibility. You're implementing the agentic loop that orchestrates these steps using the Claude API.
What is the primary mechanism your application uses to determine whether to continue the loop or stop?
A) You check the stop_reason field in each API response-the loop continues while it equals "tool_use" and exits when it changes to "end_turn" or another terminal value.
B) You manually set the tool_choice parameter to "none" after the final expected tool call to force Claude to stop requesting tools.
C) You track the number of tool calls made and exit the loop once a preconfigured maximum is reached.
D) You check whether Claude's response contains a text content block-if text is present, the agent has produced its final answer and the loop should exit.
5. You are using Claude Code to accelerate software development. Your team uses it for code generation, refactoring, debugging, and documentation. You need to integrate it into your development workflow with custom slash commands, CLAUDE.md configurations, and understand when to use plan mode vs direct execution.
A security audit requires updating your authentication library from v2 to v3. The migration guide documents breaking changes: authenticate() now returns a Promise instead of accepting a callback, the User type has restructured fields, and three deprecated methods were removed. Grep shows the library is imported in 45 files across several modules.
What's the most effective approach?
A) Paste the migration guide's breaking changes into your prompt and use direct execution to update all usages across the 45 files.
B) Enter plan mode to explore library usage across modules, map affected code paths, then create a migration strategy before implementing.
C) Create a custom slash command encapsulating the migration transformations, then execute it against each file without prior codebase exploration.
D) Update the dependency version, run the test suite, and use Claude Code to fix each failure as it appears.
질문과 대답:
| 질문 # 1 정답: A | 질문 # 2 정답: A | 질문 # 3 정답: A | 질문 # 4 정답: A | 질문 # 5 정답: B |














1 개 고객 리뷰
품질과 가치ITCertKR 의 높은 정확도를 보장하는 최고품질의 덤프는 IT인증시험에 대비하여 제작된것으로서 높은 적중율을 자랑하고 있습니다.
테스트 및 승인ITCertKR 의 덤프는 모두 엘리트한 전문가들이 실제시험문제를 분석하여 답을 작성한 만큼 시험문제의 적중률은 아주 높습니다.
쉽게 시험패스ITCertKR의 테스트 엔진을 사용하여 시험을 준비한다는것은 첫 번째 시도에서 인증시험 패스성공을 의미합니다.
주문하기전 체험ITCertKR의 각 제품은 무료 데모를 제공합니다. 구입하기로 결정하기 전에 덤프샘플문제로 덤프품질과 실용성을 검증할수 있습니다.
