SAP C_DBADM_2601 시험 개요:

SAP C_DBADM_2601 시험 요강 주제:

최신 SAP Certification Exams C_DBADM_2601 무료샘플문제

1. CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
During cutover readiness rehearsal, warehouse test users can open freight capacity reports from both SAP HANA systems. The installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded distribution reporting system has one stabilization value recorded only in monitoring notes. What should the administrator do before accepting the cutover comparison?

A) Remove the documented value from the validation database record so both systems appear aligned.
B) Reconcile the stabilization value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
C) Continue cutover preparation and review the monitoring notes only if users report inconsistent results.
D) Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during rehearsal.

2. A regional agricultural cooperative is rehearsing migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The source export finishes, and the cloud target is reachable. During validation, the administrator sees that the imported dataset can be queried, but the migration record does not include confirmation that the cloud-side monitoring view has been added to the operations checklist. The project coordinator wants to approve the rehearsal because the data query succeeded.
The constraint is that the administrator must support phased modernization while ensuring the migrated target can be monitored after cutover. Approval must not rely only on data access from the cloud database.
What should the administrator recommend?

A) Add and verify cloud-side monitoring evidence in the operations checklist, then approve the rehearsal only after target monitoring is confirmed.
B) Repeat the source export because missing monitoring evidence means the data movement probably failed.
C) Approve the rehearsal because successful target queries prove that the SAP HANA Cloud migration is ready.
D) Defer monitoring checklist updates until after production cutover so the migration schedule is not delayed.

3. CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
The upgraded reporting system and the installed validation database both pass connection checks. The upgraded system's configuration value exists in monitoring notes, while the validation database value exists in the administration record. Which validation sequence is most appropriate?

A) Confirm active states, reconcile administration records, then accept comparison evidence.
B) Apply the validation database value to the upgraded system before reviewing existing evidence.
C) Accept connection checks, then update configuration records after cutover approval.
D) Use the SAP HANA Cloud sample dataset as the comparison reference for both systems.

4. A transportation company maintains an on-premises SAP HANA database for dispatch operations while newer planning data is being moved into SAP HANA Cloud. During a recovery readiness review, the administrator confirms that full backups are being created on schedule. However, a validation exercise shows that the expected recovery point for recent operational updates cannot be reached during simulation.
The backup catalog is present, and database availability remains normal. One team member proposes creating an additional full backup immediately to strengthen protection. The service manager instead wants the next action to close the recovery exposure for current operations, not only improve future coverage.
What is the best next action?

A) Delay further action because normal database availability proves the current protection model is operationally sufficient.
B) Create a new full backup immediately because a fresh backup is the fastest way to improve recovery assurance.
C) Verify whether the available backup chain supports the required recovery point and correct the missing continuity before changing the backup schedule.
D) Restart the backup-related services so that the recovery simulation recalculates against the latest available catalog entries.

5. A consumer goods company runs an on-premises SAP HANA database for core operational processing and uses SAP HANA Cloud for newer analytical workloads. During a scheduled maintenance window, the database administrator completes preparatory upgrade steps on the on-premises system, but the post-maintenance validation shows that the database services are available while the planned upgrade state has not been reached consistently.
One lifecycle check still reports the previous software level, and dependent validation tasks remain blocked. The operations lead wants the issue resolved within the same window without introducing unnecessary rollback risk. The team can use both administration interfaces and command-level tooling, but they must confirm the upgrade state before handing the system back.
What is the best next action?

A) Restart the full database landscape again and assume the remaining lifecycle indicator will update after all services come back online.
B) Restore the pre-maintenance backup immediately because any lifecycle mismatch means the upgrade attempt has already failed.
C) Proceed with handover because service availability is the primary success criterion and version alignment can be verified later.
D) Validate the incomplete lifecycle step, confirm which upgrade phase did not finalize correctly, and complete that phase before release.

질문과 대답: