SAP C_TS462 시험 개요:
| 인증 벤더: | SAP |
| 시험명: | SAP 공인 준회원 - SAP S/4HANA 클라우드 프라이빗 에디션 판매 부문 구현 컨설턴트 |
| 시험 번호: | C_TS462_2601 |
| 자격증 유효 기간: | 최신 자격 유지 (릴리스 기준, SAP 인증 정책에 따라 변경될 수 있음) |
| 지원 언어: | English |
| 실제 시험 문항 수: | 80 |
| 시험 형식: | 객관식 단일 선택형, 객관식 복수 선택형 |
| 관련 자격증: | SAP S/4HANA Sales SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition |
| 시험 시간: | 180 minutes |
| 합격 점수: | 65% |
| 응시료: | 약 USD 550 |
| 권장 교육: | SAP 학습 여정 - SAP S/4HANA 판매 구현 |
| 시험 등록: | SAP 인증 허브 SAP 교육 및 인증 쇼핑몰 |
| 샘플 문제: | SAP C_TS462 샘플 문제 |
| 응시 방법: | SAP 인증 허브를 통한 온라인 감독 시험 |
| 전제 조건: | SAP S/4HANA 기본 지식 및 기본 판매 프로세스에 대한 이해가 권장됩니다. |
| 공식 요강 URL: | https://training.sap.com/certification |
SAP C_TS462 시험 요강 주제:
| 섹션 | 목표 |
|---|---|
| 기준 데이터 관리 | - 비즈니스 파트너 개념
|
| 시스템 구성 및 연동 | - SAP S/4HANA 판매 구성
|
| 출력 관리 및 청구 | - 청구서 문서 처리
|
| 가격 책정 및 조건 기법 | - 가격 절차 구성
|
| 판매 부문용 SAP Fiori | - 주요 사용자 앱
|
| SAP S/4HANA의 판매 프로세스 | - 주문 대금 회수 프로세스 개요
|
| 신용 및 위험 관리 | - 신용 한도 관리
|
최신 SAP Certification Exams C_TS462 무료샘플문제
1. <strong>CHALLENGE 4 — Delivery-Based Billing with Contract Bundle Pricing</strong> Pricing analysts propose temporary bundle-related condition records so rehearsal invoices match expected values. The deployment owner wants settings that remain usable for later regions.
What is the best decision?
Response:
A) alidate maintained contract and bundle-related conditions before deciding whether a targeted pricing adjustment is justified.
B) eplace contract pricing with catalog pricing until all future regions are live.
C) reate temporary condition records for every affected contractor and remove them after cutover rehearsal closes.
D) sk billing users to correct invoice values manually because invoice correction is faster than pricing remediation.
2. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Availability Confirmation Before Delivery Workload Release</strong> A project lead proposes allowing delivery creation for all complete orders, while a template owner prefers requiring availability confirmation first. Both options are technically possible for testing.
Which choice best reflects the scenario’s performance-weighted decision?
Response:
A) efer availability and delivery scheduling validation until after billing has been tested successfully.
B) pply a manual delivery block to every order so the template owner can review all documents before warehouse processing.
C) equire availability confirmation for delivery-relevant items while keeping confirmed orders eligible for efficient delivery creation.
D) ermit delivery creation for all complete orders because warehouse throughput is the highest priority in the pilot.
3. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Accessory-Kit Item Behavior in Sales Order Processing</strong> Dealer support wants flexible accessory-kit handling for priority hotel maintenance windows. The rollout lead wants to avoid dealer-specific settings that cannot be reused across later regions.
Which implementation choice best fits the scenario?
Response:
A) alidate accessory-kit behavior in the reusable template before approving any supported dealer-level variation.
B) elay accessory-kit testing until after the next dealer region is live.
C) ermit dealer-specific item controls for accessory kits because priority customer response is the immediate concern.
D) onvert all accessory-kit lines into separate standalone equipment-part orders so item behavior stays consistent.
4. A regional machinery rental company is validating SAP S/4HANA Sales during a mixed SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition and on-premise rollout. A newly introduced early-return sales flow saves successfully and creates document flow, but selected return items remain open after processing. The visible artifact is that the return document appears complete at header level, while item execution status does not reach the expected follow-on state.
The sales operations team wants the early-return process released without adding a manual status closure step. The constraint is to preserve the standard return execution path and correct only the inconsistent process behavior for the affected items.
Which validation step best addresses the open return item status?
Response:
A) dd a manual completion instruction so users can close early-return items after document flow is created.
B) djust the billing block so commercial processing waits until users manually review the open return status.
C) alidate the return process configuration and item-level follow-on control so the affected items reach the intended execution status.
D) hange the customer sales area data so early-return customers receive a separate processing default during order entry.
5. A specialty food distributor is testing SAP S/4HANA Sales delivery processing during a private-cloud rollout while retaining an on-premise sales operation. Sales orders for refrigerated products are saved and confirmed, but delivery creation fails only when the items require a newly defined cold-chain delivery path. The visible artifact is a delivery creation rejection after successful order confirmation, while customer selection and material availability appear valid.
The logistics team wants to keep the sales order entry process unchanged because non-refrigerated products work through the same order type. The constraint is to correct the downstream delivery-processing dependency for cold-chain items without changing customer master data.
Which action best resolves the cold-chain delivery rejection?
Response:
A) alidate the delivery-processing configuration and logistics-relevant assignment for the cold-chain path so the confirmed item can pass delivery creation checks.
B) hange the requested delivery date so the system retries delivery creation after the confirmed date is moved later.
C) dd a billing block for refrigerated items so invoices cannot be created until logistics manually reviews delivery eligibility.
D) hange the customer payment terms so commercial checks complete before delivery creation starts for refrigerated orders.
질문과 대답:
| 질문 # 1 정답: A | 질문 # 2 정답: C | 질문 # 3 정답: A | 질문 # 4 정답: C | 질문 # 5 정답: A |














10 개 고객 리뷰
품질과 가치ITCertKR 의 높은 정확도를 보장하는 최고품질의 덤프는 IT인증시험에 대비하여 제작된것으로서 높은 적중율을 자랑하고 있습니다.
테스트 및 승인ITCertKR 의 덤프는 모두 엘리트한 전문가들이 실제시험문제를 분석하여 답을 작성한 만큼 시험문제의 적중률은 아주 높습니다.
쉽게 시험패스ITCertKR의 테스트 엔진을 사용하여 시험을 준비한다는것은 첫 번째 시도에서 인증시험 패스성공을 의미합니다.
주문하기전 체험ITCertKR의 각 제품은 무료 데모를 제공합니다. 구입하기로 결정하기 전에 덤프샘플문제로 덤프품질과 실용성을 검증할수 있습니다.
